Pemilu Asia

Selamat datang di Pemilu.asia

Pemilu
Pemilu Presiden
Pemilu Legislatif
Pilkada
Anggota Terpilih
Daftar Nama Calon
Riwayat Hasil per Provinsi
Jendela Provinsi
Pergeseran Suara
Info Parpol
Hasil dalam Peta
Kajian
Link - link
Share/Bookmark
Pemilu Presiden, Legislatif, Pilkada

Hasil Pemilihan Umum Tahun 1977 di tingkat Provinsi dengan perbatasan provinsi yang disesuaikan dengan Tahun 2008
Hasil Pemilihan Umum Tahun 1977 di tingkat Provinsi dengan perbatasan provinsi yang disesuaikan dengan Tahun 2008
Pilpres

Kajian
Losing control
1994-03-01
The Government has lost a series of quite extraordinary political tussles over the past few months. I would go so far as to say this must be worst political performance of any Soeharto administration since the beginning of the 1970s. However let me be quite clear. The Government is in no threat of being removed or even seriously destabilised. These losses are not regime threatening. What they do suggest however is that the new Cabinet (appointed in March 1993) or more specifically the ministers charged with managing domestic politics, do not demonstrate the subtle finesse of earlier administrations in managing and massaging issues of senior personnel politics in a way that ensures the President’s preferred choices are victorious. At best these reverses suggest some diminished capacity in political management. More ominously it could also suggest that the government is failing to adjust its political management approaches to a society that is evolving quite quickly in terms of urbanisation, levels of education and familiarity with the wider world. There are four events which I would suggest constitute losses for the Government. They are: 1. the failure to prevent the re–election of Abdurrachman Wahid as General Chair of Nahdlatul Wahid in 1994; 2. the failure to prevent the appointment (on an acting basis) and ultimate formal election of Amien Rais as General Chair of Muhammadiyah from 1994; 3. the failure to prevent Megawati Sukarnoputri from becoming General Chair of PDI in late 1993; and 4. the failure to prevent the election of Aburizal Bakrie as General Chair of the National Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Kadin) in January 1994. Each of these people represents a different form of potential opposition to the Soeharto administration. Abdurrahman Wahid has demonstrated that he is a potent potential political force. The collapse of the vote for PPP in the 1987 elections was in no small way a reflection of his effectiveness to move the public. His decision to take NU out of “official politics” left PPP suffering major electoral reverses in 1987 with heaviest losses in area with a strong NU or NU affiliation such as East Java, NTB and South Kalimantan. While Golkar was the main beneficiary of this change, there should be little comfort that this new support was not vulnerable to a later shift. Amien Rais has already demonstrated a willingness to open a dialogue on issues long considered closed. The quinenniel presidential (re)–election has been reduced to discussions about the next vice–president. The idea of another president remains largely a dry theoretical discussion. Amien Rais has sought to open the door of public debate about this issue. Ideologically his commitment to the Pancasila state is often considered suspect by the New Order elites who fear a potential rightwing drift towards political Islam.
March 1994

Back to Top

Copyright©2009 www.pemilu.asia